Advocates And Solicitors

Contact us  E Mail  Sitemap

 

Home    About Rakesh Prabhakar    Disclaimer    Area of Practice     Social Services     Contact us

 


Marriage and Divorce Law

Penal Remedies

Abetment of suicide is confined to the case of person who cruelty aids the commission of suicide by the hand of person herself who commits suicide.

Section 498-A deals with cruelty by husband or relatives of husband and reads as follows:
Explanation – For the purpose of this Section, ‘cruelty’ means:

(a) any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet an.

Explanation – For the purpose of this Section, ‘cruelty’ means:
(b) any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or

(c) Harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her meet such demand”.

Section 306 deals with abetment of suicide and reads as follows:

“306. Abetment of suicide: If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine”.

Before Section 306, IPC can be acted upon, there must be clear proof of the fact that the death in question was a suicidal death when the question is whether commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative or her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage, and that her husband or relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume having regard to all other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.

The sine qua non for application of Section 306, IPC is the factum of suicide, where circumstances do not establish either murder or an abetted suicide, the accused are acquitted of Section 300 and 306 IPC but they can be convicted under Section 498A IPC.

The offence of ‘abetment’ must naturally conform to the definition of that term given in Section 107 IPC, that is to say, there must be instigation, co-operation or intentional assistance given to the would be suicide. It is neither necessary, nor it is a part of definition, that the suicide has been committed in consequence of the abetment. In order to render a person liable as an abettor. It is of course necessary, as indeed it is in the case of any other offence, that the abettor should be something more than a mute spectator- spectator hand practices. It is conceivable that such presence may encourage a woman to do a deed, which she might otherwise refrain from suicide places herself beyond the reach of law, but its abetment does not.

An important provision was introduced by Act no. 43 of 1986 to attach presumption of unnatural death in terms of Section 113-B of the Evidence Act in a case where Section 304-B is applicable. In a case of mental torture even if the girl does not commit suicide that would amount to an offence of cruelty within the meaning of Section 498-A which has been brought into existence by Section 2 of Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1989.


Where a married girl commits suicide within 7 years of marriage, the court may presume by virtue of newly created Section in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, viz, Section 113-A that her husband and relatives had abetted her to commit suicide. The complaint has to establish that harassment was with a view to force the victim to commit suicide or to fulfill illegal demand of dowry. The Section has given a new dimension to the concept of cruelty for the purposes of matrimonial remedies and that the type of conduct described would be relevant for proving cruelty.

“498-A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty: Wherever, being the husband or the relative of the husband or a woman subjects such woman to cruelty, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine”.


 

Latest Press Reports
Share Pain of Little Vishesh Gupta

PIL in Hon'ble Delhi High Court

Inspiration of The Month

Shocking Condition of Pediatric Surgery in India

Marriage & Divorce Law
Company law
Constitutional Law
Partnership Law
Criminal Law
Labour Law
Civil & Property Law
Copyright & Trademark
Consumer Law
MRTP

 


 

RAKESH PRABHAKAR & COMPANY
ADVOCATE AND SOLICITORS 
321, LAWYER CHAMBERS , WESTERN WING ,TIS HAZARI COURTS , DELHI – 110054
Ph : +91 - 11- 23925815 ,  32429638 , Fax : +91 - 11- 23991158 ,  Cell : 9811332229
E-mail : info@rprabhakar.com

 

 

 Home   |  About us   |  Disclaimer   |  Area of Practice   |  Laws  |  Laws Link  |  Social Services  |  Contact us  |  E Mail  |  Sitemap

 

Disclaimer | Privacy | Sitemap
© 2007 rprabhakar.com
site Designed & Maintained by saicreative

Advocate in Delhi : Law Firm of Delhi High Court : Lawyer Supreme Court : Service Matter Lawyer in Delhi : Advocate in  Tishazari Court : Patiala House Advocate in Delhi Lawyers : Lawyer : Delhi Advocate : Tis Hazari : Law Firm : Best Lawyer in Delhi : Divorce Lawyer : Divorce Advocate in Delhi : Famous Lawyer of Delhi : Law Firm in INDIA : Lawyer and Advocates in Delhi